Ready-to-Wow (Not Just Wear)?
Shutterstock.
ONCE upon a time in the fashion world, a consumer would fairly expect to walk into a high-end store and brace themselves for desirable goods to command a premium price tag. If one were to book a haute couture fittings appointment, the rule of thumb would be that if you have to ask then you cannot afford it. But something has significantly and inexplicably changed since the pandemic of 2020. Ready-to-wear and once ‘entry level’ luxury goods have drifted further away from being affordable and the cost has blurred into the lines of demi-couture or bespoke category clothing. If it’s not custom designed for the wearer, then why has the price inflated upwards of thirty, maybe even fifty percent? In some cases, a standard pair of sneakers can fetch upwards of $800 dollars, and high-fives to the few who would even dare grace a treadmill in such a costly item. A two-piece garment made in a factory, no matter how chic it is, can command a price akin to what a couture gown would have cost five years ago.
With special ready-to-wear catalogues landing on our fashion desk with six figure sums next to singular items, not even the full look (!), we had to sense-check ourselves and ask ‘how much is simply too much?’ Even if one can afford it, should you spend it? With our Editor-in-Chief being a seasoned buyer and long-standing fashion collector, we asked real-world questions to help us to get to the bottom of when it’s time to assess if a super high price is ever worth it.
What is your earliest memory of saving up and purchasing a special item of clothing or an accessory?
Deena: “The first item I ever bought, that was considered designer, was $75 and I saved up to buy it. It was a DKNY sweatshirt and I was so excited, because it was the first time that I bought a designer thing for myself.
What was your rationale back then?
Well, unfortunately, everything I loved and I saw on the pages of the magazine was way beyond my budget, so it was almost impossible. Every now and then, I would find something. The other item that I recall fondly was a pair of Versus loafers. Versus was the secondary line to Versace, and I was over the moon. But it took a very long to be able to get my first Chanel bag or my first trench coat, or things I thought were necessities of a wardrobe.
Has the way you approached ‘adoring something’ to ‘buying it’ evolved over time?
Of course! But what hasn't gone away, and I'm so glad that it hasn't, was the sense of excitement of something little or big that I bought. I thank my parents for this, because it never gets lost on me. I always get excited.
Some people don't have that, and I feel sorry for them. If you're so used to getting things early and you don't understand what it means, you become a little blasé about it, which, thank goodness I don't.
"Even people that are very well off and can afford those things, don't necessarily want to buy them any more."
Price rises and inflation happens, but there seems to be something going on in luxury right now, right? What have you noticed and how does that make you feel as someone who invests in iconic looks and clothes?
It makes it rarer and rarer to find something that you will love completely and feel special with. This is the problem, because with the prices rising, not only are the prices higher than ever, in a ridiculous way, what makes it even worse is that you can find the same item almost anywhere, which is a shame. There used to be a time when, if you were in a city, you enjoyed the fact that you could buy something and feel special because it wasn't available in every other city.
So, you no longer have the desire. And I'm not even sure that it's wise to do that, and I think that my thoughts are correct! Even people that are very well off and can afford those things, don't necessarily want to buy them any more.
How do you set your expectations for how much a garment is worth in the different modes of RTW and Couture?
Honestly, I have this theory, and it has worked for me in the past. And it's a bit of an unconventional theory. So bear with me. I think if you love something so much, whether it's a pair of jeans or a pair of sandals or an evening dress, it doesn't matter what this item is, and it doesn't really matter how much it costs, of course, all within your budget., I'm talking about somebody that is able to buy anything. What does matter is, are you going to wear it? It's a strange phenomenon in my head! I’ll give you an example. It's a pair of shoes. It's astronomical, $2,000 or 2,000 euros. But if you feel that you are going to use that pair of shoes almost every day of the year, it’s as if that amount is distributed across the number of times you use it. I know it's stupid, but it works for me, because nothing makes me feel worse than buying something and wearing it only once or twice, and not really utilizing it in the way that I would have loved to. Not to say that I'm not guilty of it. I have done this in the past, but in the long run, if it's something that I feel that I'm really using and it brings me joy every single time, then it becomes worth it. It may not be the correct barometer for how to measure it. But honestly, if you think of it as… take the 2,000 euros, and distribute it over the number of weeks or days in a year that you’ll use it, then it makes sense. Now I know, again, as I told you, it may not be the most practical way. But for instance, let's say a pair of jeans is so expensive, if that woman is wearing those jeans every day and she uses jeans all the time, then of course, it makes sense to someone like that woman.
It's an investment on return. So in my case, a pair of jeans that cost $1,800 or $2,000 doesn't make sense whatsoever. And I'll tell you why. I don't wear jeans much. So it doesn't make any sense for someone like me. I feel like this is how I rationalize it for myself.
"The customer is smarter than companies might think."
As a successful buyer and editor, can you describe the thoughts you have and things you consider when weighing up what something is worth?
Yes and no, I think it has to do with knowing the value to a particular market and engaging what it means to that particular market. Because everybody's different, and there's so many parts of the world. So for instance, a French woman, in Paris, what she would spend on a leather jacket or a trench coat or a beautiful blouse is going to be completely different to what a Saudi woman will go for, because she doesn't need those things in her daily life in Riyadh. You have to gauge and think of what those needs are for that particular woman, whether she's in Bordeaux or in Tabuk.
It depends on the needs, but it also depends on the market. The way you live your life in France, for instance, what you need or what you should be spending money on, versus a woman in a small village in the UAE, is very different. What she needs in her daily life and what she goes out for is very different.
What message would you like to give brands on how they approach strategy and price points?
Oh, goodness. Well, I'm not sure they would listen to me, but I think certain things just don't make sense, and I think there's proof of that, because then you see a decline in sales. There's a rule of law, what goes up must come down. It's never going to last forever in the same way. And I think we're seeing proof of that with declining sales of big conglomerates and bigger labels. Meaning, there has to be a middle ground somewhere. I think it's become ridiculous. That's really the truth. Even for a customer base that is very well off, that can absolutely afford it. Now, I'm not talking about the issue of budget, rather about the issue of value. And I think that people are smarter. The customer is smarter than these companies might think. They're not idiots. And again, there's a movement now with people spending more money on travel and experiences versus just buying a designer look.
I think it's great, plain and simple, and sometimes it's repositioning of a brand, or trying to copy another brand that has legitimate reasons for raising their price. Some brands raise prices, it makes sense, there's scarcity. If parts of it are handmade, and the resale market is a lot higher, then there is retained value. So it becomes acceptable, because you can barely find it. But some brands raise the prices for the exact same product that doesn’t always retain its value, and is made in the same factory as many other similar items. So it’s no longer special - it’s just marketing. It doesn't make sense that you paid 2,000 or 3,000 euros and now, two years later, you're paying 12,000 euros for the same bag. Especially if the quality has actually deteriorated and not gone up. It's one thing to raise prices as time goes by, but it's another thing to double and triple it immediately. And I think, in the end, that it backfires.
What do you think? Let us know your thoughts here.
READ Deena’s latest editor’s letter here.